Susquehanna Coal Co. v. Casualty Co. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
At Law. Action by the Susquehanna Coal Company against the Casualty Company of America. There was a judgment for plaintiff. On motion for an order to extend defendant’s time to settle and file a bill of exceptions, and also for an order settling such bill nunc pro tunc as of the date within 90 days from rendition of judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.
This is a motion for an order to extend defendant’s time to settle and file a bill of exceptions to August 31, 1917, and also for an order settling said bill nunc pro tunc as of the date within 90 days from April 27, 1917. The judgment ivas entered against the defendant on the. last-named date, and the term expired under the local rule in this, district on the 27th day of July last. While the time for the allowance of the writ of error has not expired, the time to settle the bill of exceptions and the term have expired.
1 think it is settled by the decisions of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Mueller v. EhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Jennings v. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Koewing v. WilderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1903
- Talbot v. Press Pub. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marion Steam Shovel Co. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920