Legal Opinion

Shettles v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1961PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

Plaintiff in error was indicted for embezzlement and grand larceny. She was convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to not more than three years in the State penitentiary. In the outset we are met with a motion on behalf of the State to dismiss the appeal because the plaintiff in error failed to file her motion for a new trial within thirty (30) days of the verdict, as is required by Section 27-201, T.C.A. This Section of the Code now reads:

*159“A rehearing or motion for new trial can only be applied for within thirty (30) days from the decree, verdict or judgment sought to be affected, subject,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  2. McAlester v. MonteverdeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  3. Payne v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brewer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  5. McCall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. ReidTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hendrix v. City of MaryvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
  4. Weakley v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Appelbaum v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API