Kelly v. Harris
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
On July 24, 1957, plaintiff filed a request for admission of facts, directed to “Frisbee & Moore, Attorneys for Defendant”, Cut Bank, Montana. On June 20, 1957, defendant had filed a praecipe for the entry of Doyle and Francisco of Conrad, Montana as attorneys for the defendant, reciting that Frisbee & Moore bad withdrawn and were no longer attorneys for the defendant. On August ■9, 1957, Doyle & Francisco, as attorneys -.for the defendant, filed answers to plaintiff’s request, six days after the ten days ■prescribed for answer by Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Mars v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Countee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Eberle v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Meyer v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Robert Allen French v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Moses v. MosesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Wheeler v. Carlson TransportMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- England v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- State ex rel. Craig v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1969