Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Berks County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided February 3, 1958No. 8PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hess, J.,

Defendants Charles Jackson and Gilbert R. Jackson (alias Sweet Man) were tried by a jury under bills of indictment charg*219ing: (1) Robbery by assault and force, and (2) assault and battery. The jury returned a verdict of guilty against both defendants, and the proceeding is now before the court en banc on defendants’ motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.

Defendants were tried along with one Margaret Miller (alias Margaret “Midge” Williams)., she being an accessory before the fact to robbery in an indictment to no. 9, September sessions,. 1957. The Commonwealth contended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. SchusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Commonwealth v. NestorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Commonwealth v. ParmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Commonwealth v. HabeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PortalatinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. JACKSONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Commonwealth v. PortalatinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API