Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Dean Melius

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1997No. 97-1237PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FENNER, District Judge.

After the declaration of a mistrial without his consent, Michael Dean Melius (“Melius”) filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against him on double jeopardy grounds. Melius now appeals the order of the district court 2 which denied his motion to dismiss. Because we hold that the district court exercised sound discretion in determining that the mistrial was based upon “manifest necessity,” we affirm the district court’s order.

I

On November 13 and 14, 1996, Melius was tried in Duluth, Minnesota, on a two-count superseding indictment charging him with possession with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Jim Guy TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Najawicz v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  3. United States v. Carlous HortonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Day v. HaskellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. United States v. TuckerDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API