Legal Opinion

Smith v. DeNiro

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1971No. 12036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from a quiet title judgment based on a boundary by acquiescence. Reversed, with no costs awarded.

This suit questions ownership of a strip of land, called the Gordon Mill Race, situate between the parties’ properties which was used for over 50 years to transport water, but which use was abandoned in 1966. Both parties claim title on the theory mentioned, but the evidence reflects no common grantor, no payment of taxes by anyone, and no acquiescence by anyone owning the disputed property, save some disinterested cows that at times have browsed the mill race, subject of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fuoco v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Dragos v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. DeNiroUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Condas v. WillesenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Smith v. DeNiroUtah Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API