Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stetson v. Howard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 24, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

These three actions of tort were tried together. The actions of Anna G. Stetson and Luman Prest were brought to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by them when riding in an automobile operated by the defendant. The action of Clarence F. Stetson was brought to recover medical expenses incurred by him on account of his daughter, Anna G. Stetson, who was a minor at the time of the accident. The defendant moved for a directed verdict in each case. The motions were allowed and the plaintiffs excepted.

The verdicts were directed rightly. Proof of gross negligence on the part of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Burke v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Marcienowski v. SandersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adamian v. MesserlianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Desroches v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Dean v. BolducMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Picarello v. RodakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Lefebvre v. HowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API