State v. Cordeira
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
NAKAMURA. J.
The defendant in a criminal case tried before a jury “is entitled to an instruction on every defense or theory of defense having any support in the evidence.” State v. O’Daniel, 62 Haw. 518, 527, 616 P.2d 1383, 1390 (1980) (emphasis in original). Steven Cordeira, who relied on an alibi defense at trial, contends the trial court erred in refusing his alibi instructions. But after reading the court’s charge to the jury in its entirety, we are convinced no error was committed. Thus, we affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit.
I
Shortly after…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. O'DANIELHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- State v. FelicianoHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- The People v. PoeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Witt v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EstradaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. GabrilloHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. El-TabechNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. LiraHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
- Loher v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.