United States v. Dumas
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL
SKINNER, District Judge.
Defendant Roland M. Dumas moves for a new trial on the grounds that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel within the meaning of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendant asserts that he was denied counsel as a matter of law because during his representation his attorney was not a member of the bar of this court, nor otherwise authorized to appear and practice before this court under special provisions applying to government attorneys. At the time, defendant’s counsel had been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Barbara Mouzin, United States of America v. Alfonso CarvajalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. John NovakCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HowzeOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- State v. J.R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022