Legal Opinion

United States v. Neufeld

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 17, 1996No. CR-2-94-144PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.

Defendants Neufeld and Mickle move to dismiss the indictments against them on double jeopardy grounds. The Court declared defendants’ first trial a mistrial after the government introduced unfairly prejudicial testimony that the defendants were gay lovers. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies defendants’ motion to dismiss.

I

The government charges Dr. Elliot Neu-feld and Jon Mickle with violations of the Medicare-Medicaid Anti-Kickback statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b). The Anti-Kickback statute prohibits health care providers from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. "R.D" v. Shohola Camp Ground and ResortDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Kitchen v. Ross County Court of Common PleasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  3. State v. Michael J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API