Legal Opinion

Elmore v. Southern Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1921No. 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Money rule. Before Judge Harrell. Dougherty superior court. October 30, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

This is a money rule against a sheriff, involving the claims of the holders of conflicting liens. Ho facts were involved which would entitle either party to equitable relief; and there being no prayer for such relief, the case is not within the principle of Berrie v. Smith, 97 Ga. 782 (25 S. E. 757). The remedy is purely statutory, and the case is not of that class of which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, but is of the class of which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction. While this court has likened a money rule to mandamus, of which it has jurisdiction as an extraordinary legal remedy,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berrie v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spence v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Alsabrook v. Prudential InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Burkhalter v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Rucker v. StarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  5. Hosch v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API