Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Prince

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit, for work, labor, etc. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. William G. Ewing, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Gary

delivered the opinion ok the Court.

The parties made a contract whereby the appellee undertook to do a job of carpenter work upon the house of the appellant for $1,200. The appellant had paid $1,550 and ivas entitled to further credit of $45.60. The appellee sued for $496.83 more, of which $265 was for some minor contracts. The appellant having paid $85 more than the contracts called for,The demand of the appellee was wholly for extras.

The court found for him $466.83. His demand being, in fact, for extras, the burden of proof was upon him. We can not recapitulate the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Castle Concrete Co. v. Fleetwood Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  2. Leafgreen v. YablonskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API