Legal Opinion

Peedin v. . Oliver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

A careful consideration of the evidence shown in the record on this appeal, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, fails to show error in the judgment of nonsuit entered in Superior Court. Plaintiff’s challenge thereto is controlled by answer to three questions:

First: Does the notice of foreclosure sufficiently describe the land to be sold? The answer is Yes. While the statute, O. S., 2588, provides that “in sales of real estate under deeds of trust or mortgages it is the duty of trustee or mortgagee making such sale to fully describe the premises in the notice required by law…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Froneberger v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Bruner v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Mills v. . Building Loan Assn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Hare v. . WeilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Collier v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Hughes v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Graham v. Northwestern BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Carroll v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API