Legal Opinion
Gevas v. Ghosh
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 28, 2009No. 08-1538PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
David Gevas appeals from the district court’s order enforcing a settlement agreement that he denies entering into. He also argues that the court attempted to coerce him into settling. We affirm.
Gevas filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that Dr. Partha Ghosh and other prison staff members and administrators at Stateville Correctional Center were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs when they refused to address his requests to treat a painful hand injury and a lump on one of his legs. The district judge referred the case to a magistrate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Clyde Piggie v. Zettie Cotton, Cylde Piggie v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Arlene Otis v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Lynch, Inc. v. Samatamason Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Lawrence Head v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Elustra v. MineoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Moore v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Demetrious Smith v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- K4 Enterprises, Inc. v. Grater, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Love v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.