Legal Opinion

Moulie v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Record for Duval eounty. The facts in the case are'stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Liddon, J.:

The plaintiff in error was charged in the court below with obtaining money by false pretenses. The information, omitting formal commencement, conclusion and affidavit, reads as follows: “ThatE. Moulie, laborer, late of the county of Duval and State of Florida, on the 11th day of April, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and ninety-three, in the county and State aforesaid, feloniously devising and intending to cheat and defraud one Louise Armellini of her property, designedly, by a false pretense, and with intent to defraud the said Louise Armellini, unlawfully,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ladd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  2. State v. LathropSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  3. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  4. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. State v. NeuhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API