Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Pappalardo

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 11, 1997No. 95-P-794PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJacobs, J.

The separation agreement of the parties was incorporated and merged in their 1980 divorce judgment. It provided that the plaintiff was to have custody of the two children of the parties, Steven, then six years old, and Alison, then three years old, and that the husband pay weekly support of forty-five dollars per child. Among its other provisions were the following:

“The Wife shall keep the Husband informed of all matters affecting the children’s health and including the results of all consultations with doctors.”
“The parties have intentionally omitted any descrip*472tion of further liability for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Feakes v. BozyczkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Reum v. BrazeauMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  3. Clark v. BarbaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mandel v. MandelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  2. Smith-Clarke v. ClarkeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Purdy v. ColangeloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Luz C. Aponte v. Eliseo Barvosa DieppaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998
  5. Aponte v. Barbosa DieppaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API