Legal Opinion

Powell v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 15, 2006No. 129, September Term, 2005, 130, September Term, 2005PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

In this consolidated opinion,1 we consider whether the respective trial judges, in the criminal cases of Tavony Wayne Zylanz and Steven Anthony Powell, erred by not making explicit findings on the record regarding the knowing and voluntary waivers of the Petitioners’ rights to trial by jury, in accordance with Maryland Rule 4-246(b). In the case of Powell, we consider also, in the context of the record in his case, whether on-the-record questions addressed to him specif*636ically as to the voluntariness of his jury trial waiver were required.

I

A

Tavony Wayne Zylanz

On 21 June 2004, in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. State v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. New Jersey Ex Rel. Lennon v. StrazzellaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Boulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Valonis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Christian v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API