Legal Opinion

Blaz v. Molin Concrete Products Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1976No. 46132, 46133PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David E. Marsden, Justice. *

Plaintiffs, Ned E. Blaz and Aleck Ostrow, commenced separate tort actions against corporate defendant Molin Concrete Products Co. and individual defendants William Molin and Donald J. Flood, employees of the corporate defendant. At pretrial conference, their claims for relief were narrowed to false imprisonment. * 1 At the close of the testimony Blaz moved for a directed verdict with respect to his own. complaint, but this motion was denied. By special verdict, the jury found that Blaz had not been falsely imprisoned. Ostrow’s complaint was thereafter dismissed for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Durgin v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Park Plaza State Bank v. CWS Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. MacHinery Hauling, Inc. v. Steel of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Bass v. Morgan, Lewis & BockiusDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. El-Ghazzawy v. BerthiaumeDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
  4. Mellett v. Fairview Health ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. Cavanaugh v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API