Legal Opinion

Scofield v. National Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 29, 1896No. Nos. 9912-(160)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court for Big Stone county, in favor of plaintiff for $110.77, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of C. L. Brown, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

The only material question arising upon this appeal, which we deem necessary to discuss, is one of pleading.

• One Peder Anderson for several years had owned, lived upon, and farmed a certain tract of land in Big Stone county, in this state, which was incumbered by a real-estate mortgage. Some time previous to the commencement of this action he became insolvent, and thereupon deeded the incumbered land to a mortgage company holding the mortgage, in satisfaction thereof. This company leased the land to Sena Anderson, wife of Peder Anderson, for the year 1893, and he purchased from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nash v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Freeman v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. County of WadenaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Consumers Grain Co. v. Wm. Lindeke Roller MillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. In re Lathrop Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1933
  5. Lynch v. Monarch Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API