Legal Opinion

United States v. Forehand

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 13, 2013No. Criminal Action No. 1:12cr181-MHTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Myron H. Thompson, District Judge.

Defendant Edward Lincoln Forehand is charged with wire, mail, and securities fraud, and transacting in criminally derived property, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1843 and 1341, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), and 18 U.S.C. § 1957(a). Before the court is the government’s pretrial motion to exempt its expert witness from sequestration pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 615(c). For reasons that will be explained, the motion will be granted.

Upon “a party’s request, the court must order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear other witnesses’ testimony.”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Gene Miller v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Lena v. Morvant, Etc. v. Construction Aggregates CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Edward C. Smith v. Borough of WilkinsburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAbee v. ChapmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. FarFromBoringPromotions.Com v. Burrell-CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API