Henry v. City of Sacramento
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Matt. F. Johnson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, with leave to amend; and plaintiff declining to amend, judgment was rendered for defendant. From this judgment plaintiff appeals.
It is alleged in the complaint that on September 11, 1893, one A. L. Fish entered into a certain contract set forth in the complaint, with the defendant, the city of Sacramento; that thereafter on March 1, 1894, the said Fish duly assigned said contract to J. H. Henry and A. Abbott; that thereafter the said Abbott duly assigned all his interest in the contract to the said J. H. Henry; and that on November 27, 1894, the said…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Byrne v. HarveyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Pettit v. ForsythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Felton v. NurnbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920