Legal Opinion

Pettit v. Forsyth

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1910No. Civ. No. 696PublishedCited by 4 opinions

'APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This case is here on appeal from the judgment, on the verdict of a jury, in plaintiff’s favor, and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. A general and special demurrer to the complaint was interposed and overruled, which gives rise to the principal questions now before us and calls for a sufficiently full statement of the pleading thus attacked.

The complaint sets forth that on December 31, 1895, defendant, “as party of the first part, and plaintiff and one John D. Sprower, as parties of the second part,” entered into an agreement, which is attached to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. San Jose Ranch Co. v. San Jose Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Short v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gunderson v. GundersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Hutchison v. BarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Starkweather v. EddyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Wilkinson v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API