New York State National Organization for Women v. Cuomo
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
This action arises out of alleged constitutional violations committed by the New York State Division of Human Rights (“SDHR” or the “Division”) through its failure to process discrimination complaints in a timely manner. Plaintiffs, including members of the New York State National Organization for Women (“NOW”), and individual plaintiff-intervenors, now move to amend their complaint1 pursuant to Rule 15(a), F.R.Civ.P., to add additional parties in their individual capacities and to create an additional subclass of plaintiffs.2
NOW separately argues that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- New York State National Organization for Women v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- New York State National Organization for Women v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Chet Baker Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Fantasy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- NEW YORK STATE NAT. ORGAN. FOR WOMEN v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- New York State National Organization for Women v. CuomoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.