Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ernst & Young
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 9, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-1443PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLANNERY, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court upon the defendant’s motion to dismiss for improper venue or, alternatively, to transfer to the Northern District of Texas.
I. Background
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brought this civil enforcement action against Ernst & Young (“E & Y”) seeking a permanent injunction that would prohibit alleged future violations by E & Y of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rules promulgated pursuant to that statute. E & Y moves that this action be dismissed because venue is not proper in the District of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Eastern Air LinesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Page Airways, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Comptroller of the Currency v. Calhoun First National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. v. American Petroleum InstituteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Vencor Nursing Centers, L.P. v. ShalalaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Kafack v. Primerica Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Commission v. Cephalon, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States v. Crop Growers Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.