Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 4, 1954No. C. D. 1592PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

Plaintiff here contends that certain imported merchandise described on the consular invoice as “10,000 metres chains in rolls” consists in fact of chain for use in the manufacture of bicycle chains. It was imported in rolls of 33% or 50 meters being sufficient to produce 22 or 23 bicycle chains.

It appears from the record that each length is exactly the same as every other length, that there is no indication as to where the chain is to he severed in the production of completed chains, and that the exclusive use of the merchandise is either in making or repairing bicycle chains.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Snow's United States Sample Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Dehler Signoret Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  2. Henry Greenberg & Bros. Export & Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Henry Greenberg & Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. United States v. Henry Greenberg & Bros. Export & Import Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API