Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Caban

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1997No. 94-1015-CRPublished

1Dissent

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, CHIEF JUSTICE

¶ 28. (dissenting). The problem with this case, as the State's brief explains, is that "[a]t the suppression hearing, the defense and the prosecution could have been two ships passing in the night." Brief for State at 11.1 agree with the State's characterization of the suppression hearing. Apparently so did the court of appeals. This record produced three opinions in the court of appeals: the "lead opinion" by Judge Sundby, a concurrence by Judge Gartzke, and a dissent by Judge Dykman. State v. Caban, 202 Wis. 2d 417, 551 N.W.2d 24 (Ct. App. 1996).

*612¶ 29. I…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. TompkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. MoatsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. McConnohieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API