F.A.C., Inc. v. Cooperativa De Seguros De Vida De Puerto Rico
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LYNCH, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to its inherent powers to issue sanctions for conduct undertaken in bad faith, the district court found one party to a settlement deserving of sanctions and ordered it to pay $469,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs. That party, Cooperativa de Seguros de Vida de Puerto Rico (“COS-VI”), foolishly had filed a token opposition to the sanctions motion filed by its opponent, F.A.C., Inc. (“FAC”). Only when the court allowed sanctions did COSVI belatedly produce, on motion for reconsidera tion, evidence and argument that its conduct was a reasonable interpretation of its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- In re Plaza-MartínezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Mendez-Aponte v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. SicilianoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Lu v. MeninoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Pimentel-Soto v. v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.