State ex rel. Public Disclosure Commission v. Permanent Offense
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Suzanne Karr challenges the decision of the Snohomish County Superior Court determining that she violated the Washington public disclosure act (PDA), chapter 42.17 RCW. We hold that the portions of the PDA that she challenges do not unconstitutionally infringe on her First Amendment rights. We also hold that the superior court had subject matter jurisdiction to decide this case, that there was no violation of Karr’s right to due process, and that the findings of fact and conclusions of law were proper. We affirm.1
Cox, J.
¶2 At the end of 1999, Suzanne Karr and Tim Eyman formed a political…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Evergreen Freedom Found.Washington Supreme Court · 2019
- Cooke v. Illinois State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Grocery Manufacturers AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State v. Econ. Dev. Bd. for Tacoma-Pierce Cnty.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.