Legal Opinion
(PC) Torres v. Quick
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 23, 2025No. 1:22-cv-01536Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-KES-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 RECOMMENDING THAT CORRECTIONAL v. OFFICER DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR 11 SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE GRANTED JAYSON QUICK, et al., 12 Defendants. (ECF No. 70) 13 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY 14 DAYS 15 16 Edward Torres (Plaintiff) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint arises from events that took 18 place in March and April of 2019…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.