Legal Opinion

Charles E. Beard, Inc. v. Cameronics Technology Corp.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided April 30, 1988No. Civ. A. No. B-87-01359-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

Defendants, Cameronics Technology Corporation, Ltd., and Cameronics International, Inc. (Cameronics) filed a 12(e) FED.R. CIV.P. motion for a more definite statement on the following grounds:(1) Plaintiff failed to identify the particular dates of any agreement between the parties;(2) Plaintiff failed to identify the specific make and model number of the camera in question, and failed to allege the specific camera defects;(3) Plaintiff failed to plead the maximum amount in damages and each element of damage he seeks;(4) Plaintiff failed to set forth any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Norman R. Spears v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. James Elliott and Joseph Defley v. Leander H. Perez, Jr., Etc., Eugene E. Leon, Jr., Etc., and Frank KleinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  5. Mitchell v. E-Z Way Towers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pitts v. Northern Telecom, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Acosta, Jr. v. Monsanto CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
  3. Diane v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  4. Godfrey v. First StudentDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API