Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Oakley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1953No. 5622PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Ruth Oakley as plaintiff brought suit •against defendants Ray J. Hansen and ■ Marie N. Hansen, husband and wife, and Dan Hansen,- a single man, to recover damages for injuries she admittedly suffered as a result of the negligence of Dan Hansen in failing to heed a stop sign at ’ the intersection of 48th Street and East McDowell Road, near Phoenix. The collision practically demolished plaintiff’s car, and caused painful and permanent injuries to her person. The jury awarded her damages in the sum of $10,000 against all three defendants. Defendant Dan Hansen perfected no appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Sanders v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Silva v. TraverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lee Moor Contracting Co. v. BlantonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Otero v. Soto Ex Rel. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. O'Brien v. HaferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State v. Superior Court, in & for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Driscoll v. HarmonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Helton v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API