Hides v. Hides
New York Supreme Court
This was a suit to annul a marriage between plaintiff and defendant, and to set aside a conveyance to defendant by plaintiff at the time of the marriage, on the ground that the marriage was brought about and the conveyance obtained from plaintiff by defendant by means of fraud and undue influence.
Read the full summary
This was a suit to annul a marriage between plaintiff and defendant, and to set aside a conveyance to defendant by plaintiff at the time of the marriage, on the ground that the marriage was brought about and the conveyance obtained from plaintiff by defendant by means of fraud and undue influence. The cause was referred to Hon. A. D. Wait, who found the following facts and conclusions of law: 1. This suit was commenced October 19, 1880, and a copy of the complaint and a lis pendens filed in the clerk’s office of Saratoga county on the same day. 2. On the 29th day of September, 1880, the…
1Opinion of the Court
The referee wrote the following opinion:
A. Wait, Referee.
—The plaintiff and the defendant Mary Hides intermarried in September, 1880, at Saratoga Springs, and on the same day of the marriage, but prior thereto, the plaintiff, in pursuance of an ante-nuptial agreement between them, conveyed to her by warranty deed certain real estate in Ballston Spa, the deed reciting that the same was “in consideration of the sum of one dollar and a marriage settlement between the parties hereto to him duly paid and contract of marriage carried out.”
This suit was commenced in October, 1880, for the purpose of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Masson v. BovetCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Hammond v. . PennockNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Griffin v. . GriffinNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Heinemann v. . HeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Wightman v. WightmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rubman v. RubmanNew York Supreme Court · 1931