Legal Opinion

Aaberg v. HA Harman Company

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 12, 1960No. 18843PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

The parties are here in inverse order of their appearance in the trial court. We will refer to the plaintiffs in error as the Aabergs and to the defendant in error corporation as the Harmans because H. A. Harman, Arsona Harman and Nancy Harman, incorporators of this family company, are the actual parties in interest and assigned their claim to the corporate plaintiff below. In like manner Aabergs had operated through various entities known as Aaberite Industries, Aaberite Trust and Western Engineers Co. One of the contentions of the Aabergs is that some of these companies should have been,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WilkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. Jessey v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  3. Springhetti v. HahnewaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  4. Johnson v. National Sugar Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. Gibraltar Colorado Life Co. v. BrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  4. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Laurence J. BeardsleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  5. Royden Brown v. Herbert B. Alkire, and Forest S. AlkireCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API