Bennett v. State

The accusation in this case, as amended, alleges “that the said Julius Bennett on or about the 1st day of December in the year 1926, in the county aforesaid, then and there unlawfully, having contracted with T. H. Bennett to perform for him certain services, necessary in the conduct of a turpentine farm, to wit, chip certain pine trees, dip gum, or any other kind of ■ labor usually performed in the conduct of a turpentine farm for the usual wages paid for said class of labor to wit, $1.50 per 1000 for chipping and from $2.00 to $2.50 per thousand when rented, with intent to procure from him…