Legal Opinion

Starling v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1908No. 1381PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Accusation of cheating, etc., from city court of Leesburg — Judge-Long. August 26, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

A motion is made to dismiss this writ of-error. This motion is based upon four grounds, as follows: “1st. Because said writ of error is not entitled in the cause or court. 2d. Because the certificate to the bill of exceptions of the trial judge does not specify, as material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of, the whole or any part of the record of said case in the trial court. 3d. Because there is nothing in the assignment of error or bill of exceptions to show that the trial court ever passed sefitence upon the defendant, reference being merely made to a ‘verdict of guilty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Glenn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Presley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Harwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Singleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  3. Banton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Bullard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Draper v. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API