Legal Opinion

Ballard v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 3 Div. 886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The argument for petitioner overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals to questions of law therein presented, as set forth in Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91, and subsequent cases. Most of the questions here argued were not treated or considered by the Court of Appeals, and do not come within the purview of our review of the decisions of that court. Jackson v. State, 217 Ala. 563, 117 So. 157; Polytinsky v. Wilson, 215 Ala. 455, 111 So. 276; Campbell v. State, 216 Ala. 295, 112 So. 902.

Nor do we think the opinion of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. MinderhoutSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Polytinsky v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. HimrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Keith v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Smiley v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  5. Messer v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API