Legal Opinion

Keith v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 24, 1950No. 6 Div. 145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The two propositions reviewed and decided by the Court of Appeals are, first, that § 1329 of the General City Code of Birmingham, under which the prosecution of the case was undertaken, was valid; and, second, that the circuit court of Jefferson County had jurisdiction of the cause.

Review here is limited to these two questions, since matters not considered and treated by the Court of Appeals are not within the purview of review by certiorari. Ex parte Stephenson, 252 Ala. 316, 40 So. 2d 716; Harris v. State, 247 Ala. 194, 23 So.2d 514; Pool v. Hart, 222 Ala. 232, 132 So. 59;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. ReedAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Ex Parte StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Ballard v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. City of Birmingham v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. In re Stewart v. Carter Realty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. L.E.O. v. A.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Leo v. ALCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API