Legal Opinion

State v. Peck

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1993No. 93-178PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Defendant/Appellant, Mark Emerson Peck, appeals pro se from an order of the Second Judicial District Court, Silver Bow County, dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief on the grounds that he failed to state a claim for relief, and denying his motion for appointment of counsel for a hearing on the petition.

We affirm.

1. Did the District Court err when it denied appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief and assistance of counsel for a hearing on the petition, pursuant to § 46-21-201(1) and (2), MCA?

2. Did appellant’s sentence and condition of parole ineligibility violate the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AustadMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. StumpfMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Matter of JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. WatsonMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. EvansMontana Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vernon Kills on Top v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Ellenburg v. ChaseMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Griffin v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. CobellMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GodfreyMontana Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API