Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. 38 East 29 Street, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

Plaintiff, a workers’ compensation insurance carrier, commenced this action to enforce its lien for past benefits paid to the employee-claimant, Joseph Walsh, on an $85,000 settlement received by Walsh in a third-party action (see Workers’ Compensation Law, § 29, subd 1). Plaintiff, at the time of the recovery, had paid Walsh $16,567.14 in benefits.

Plaintiff moved for summary judgment to enforce its lien, less the amount deemed to be its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. State Insurance FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Castleberry v. Hudson Valley Asphalt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ianielli v. North River InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Wood v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Goga v. Gulf Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Smith v. SpinocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API