Trainor v. Worman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Koon, J. presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
The complaint alleges a contract between plaintiff and defendant by which the former agreed to furnish certain material and perform certain labor towards the erection of certain dwelling-houses for the latter, and for which the latter agreed to pay the former $8,253, of which sum $450 is unpaid. It alleges full performance by plaintiff of the contract according to its terms. The answer admits that there was a contract in regard to the building of the houses, but denies each and every other allegation in the statement of the cause of action above set forth. It then alleges two counterclaims…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paine v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Bryant v. LivermoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Trainor v. WormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Prince v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Phipps v. McFarlaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hayday v. Hammermill Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Trainor v. WormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State v. Equitable Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- State ex rel. Kohler Contracting Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918