Van der Plaat v. Undertakers' & Liverymen's Ass'n
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show cause why an injunction should not issue. Heard on bill, with affidavits annexed, and affidavits in answer thereto.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitivey, Y. 0.
The object of the bill is to enjoin a boycott.
The allegation of the bill is that the complainant is educated as an embalmer and undertaker, and has been, for two months prior 'to the filing of the bill, ready and willing to engage in that business, in the city of Paterson, in Passaic county, but has been prevented from doing so by the defendant association and its members.
It will be observed at once that the complainant has not, on his own showing, the least shadow of an established business. He does not own a single appliance necessary or convenient for the transaction of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Fry v. Superior Court of Lake CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Golden Gate Sightseeing Tours, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- First Camden National Bank, C., Co. v. WilentzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
- Perfect Laundry Co. v. MarshNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Scott v. CholmondeleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.