Legal Opinion

Continental Enterprises, Inc. v. Cain

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1979No. 3-376 A 55PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRARD, Presiding Judge.

Appellant (Continental) is the owner of a peninsula which extends into Sylvan Lake. Both the lake and peninsula were formed around 1838 when the state dammed the Little Elkhart River. This appeal stems from Continental’s second unsuccessful attempt to acquire an easement over the only unsubmerged land adjoining the peninsula. In its earlier action Continental had relied on the common law doctrine of easement by necessity, but because its land and the adjoining land of appellee (Cain) had never been held by a common grantor, we held that unity of ownership had not been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Fountain Park Co. v. HenslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Luke v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  4. Kessler v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Foltz, Van Camp Hdw., Etc. v. City of Indpls.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Faris Mailing, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue, Sales and Use Tax DivisionIndiana Tax Court · 1990
  2. Biddle v. BAA Indianapolis, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. v. McCartyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  4. Frum v. Little Calumet River Basin Development CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Bradley SurVance v. Duke Energy Indiana, LLC (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API