State v. Taffaro
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rabner
This case tests the limits of a judge’s authority to question witnesses at trial. Trial courts have an obligation to insure that trials proceed fairly, and judges may question witnesses to clarify testimony, expedite a case, and otherwise protect the proceedings. But in exercising their discretionary power, judges must take care not to influence the jury by signaling doubt about a witness’s credibility. To do otherwise might place the court’s impartiality in question and affect the trial’s outcome.
In this case, the trial judge’s questioning of a criminal defendant ran counter to the above…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jenkins v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. Michael Ross II (077458) (Middlesex and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- State v. StasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- State v. BelliardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- L.M.F. v. J.A.F.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- State v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.