Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided January 25, 2006No. 8866-03Published

P is a U.S. citizen who earned wage income while working in Antarctica. P excluded this wage income on his 2001 Federal income tax return. R issued a notice of deficiency in which R determined that the excluded wage income earned in Antarctica is taxable. Held: The wage income P earned in Antarctica is not excludable from income under sec. 911, I.R.C.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVE ARNETT, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Arnett v. Comm'r

No. 8866-03

United States Tax Court

126 T.C. 89; 2006 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 5; 126 T.C. No. 5;

January 25, 2006, Filed

P is a U.S. citizen who earned wage income while working in

Antarctica. P excluded this wage income on his 2001 Federal

income tax return. R issued a notice of deficiency in which R

determined that the excluded wage income earned in Antarctica is

taxable.

Held: The wage income P earned in Antarctica is not

excludable from income under sec. 911, I.R.C.

Larry D. Harvey, for petitioner.

Randall L. Preheim,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  5. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API