Legal Opinion

Gubser v. Department of Employment

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1969No. Civ. 1004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The Department of Employment of the State of California and the State Personnel Board appeal from a judgment of the superior court granting a peremptory writ pursuant to a mandamus proceeding under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. The State Personnel Board found respondent Gubser guilty on two separate charges of “inexcusable neglect of duty” within the meaning of section 19572, subdivision (d), of the Government Code, and ordered his dismissal for each separate violation. The superior court found that one charge was not supported by the evidence and although the other charge was true…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People v. McCaughanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Shepherd v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Houghton v. Loma Prieta Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bessie Gerhardt v. Fresno Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Overton v. Goldsboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Martin v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Hosford v. State Personnel Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. ABS INSTITUTE v. City of LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Duax v. Kern Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API