Legal Opinion
De Anda v. Midland-Ross Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 22, 1986No. 85 C 3819PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
Third-party defendant Borse Plastic Products Corp. moves to dismiss the complaint of defendant/third-party plaintiff Midland-Ross Corp. against it for contribution or indemnity. The underlying action arose apparently in April 1983 when Gerardo DeAnda, an employee of Borse, was allegedly injured on the job while working on a plastic mold press machine manufactured by Midland-Ross.
Barred from suing his employer by the Illinois Workmen's Compensation Act, Ill. Rev.Stat. ch. 48 II 138.1 et seq., DeAnda seeks to recover from Midland-Ross on a strict…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alvis v. RibarIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Doyle v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Coney v. J. L. G. Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Willie v. Amerada Hess Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- Britt-Tech Corp. v. American Magnetics Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1992