Legal Opinion

Portage City Water Co. v. City of Portage

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin

Decided July 2, 1900No. 18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On Demurrer to Complaint for Want of Jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the Court

IH’NX, District Judge.

The demurrer to the complaint raises an important and interesting question of jurisdiction, under that clause of the jurisdiction act of 1887-88 providing as follows:

“Nor shall any circuit or district court have cognizance of any suit, except upon foreign bills of exchange, to recover the contents of any promissory note or other chose in action, in favor of any assignee or any subsequent holder ⅞ » * unless such suit might have been prosecuted in such court to recover the said contents, if no assignment or transfer had been made.” 25 Stat. 483, 434, c. 866, § 1.

It…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Montalet v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1807
  2. Sere & Laralde v. PitotSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Parker v. OrmsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Morgan's v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Gibson v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1842

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Power & Irrigation Co. of Clear Lake v. Capay Ditch Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  2. Farr v. Hobe-Peters Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1910
  3. Bolles v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904
  4. Moore Bros. Glass v. Drevet Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API