Legal Opinion

Lensch v. Metallizing Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1942No. 10000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

In this action brought by appellants for infringement of their patent, appeal was taken from the order dismissing the action on the ground of non-infringement.

This is the second chapter of litigation in this court involving patents in the field of metal spraying. In Emmett v. Metals Processing Corporation, 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 796, we considered the process of metal spraying. The present litigation involves a machine used in the process. The history of the entire field of uniting metals probably begins with either the discovery that two pieces of metal could be united by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wagenhorst v. Hydraulic Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  2. Emmett v. Metals Processing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Eskimo Pie Corp. v. LevousCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
  4. Hayes Pump & Planter Co. v. Friend Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  5. Laclede-Christy Clay Products Co. v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bourne v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1951
  2. Keyes Fibre Co. v. Chaplin Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API