Legal Opinion

Mark Jenkins v. Carlos Arce

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 10, 2024No. 2:24-cv-08473Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 MARK JENKINS, No. 2:24-cv-08473-DOC-BFM 13 Petitioner, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 WHY HABEAS PETITION CARLOS ARCE, SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 SUMMARY OF ORDER 19 Petitioner Mark Jenkins filed a habeas petition in federal court arguing 20 that he should be resentenced in state court. Jenkins’ claim does not appear to 21 be cognizable on federal habeas review—meaning, it is not the kind of claim for 22 which the federal courts may grant habeas relief. Federal courts may…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Wilson v. CorcoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Abbott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API