Legal Opinion

Peker v. Steglich

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 27, 2009No. 07-2379-cvPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant H.E. Elya Peker, pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint alleging a violation of the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying *39facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

We review de novo a district court’s dismissal of a complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc., 282 F.3d 147, 152 (2d Cir.2002). We “construe] the complaint liberally, accepting all factual allegations in the complaint as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Navajo NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Andrew Chen and Chen Printing and Supply Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Mosher-Simons v. County of AlleganyNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Roque v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  2. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  3. Gu v. DidonatoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  4. Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Baker Botts L.L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  5. Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Baker Botts L.L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API